| ??? 01/15/03 11:44 Read: times |
#36478 - RE: C++ |
I was expecting this anti-C++ reaction when I saw this post yesterday...
But hey, if its a good compiler and you don't use any of the OO language features, the assembly generated won't be any different from that of a C compiler.. and I can't think of many embedded system applications that would require polymorphism or inheritance! :-)) Still, even if you do not use C++, that doesn't mean that you stop doing Object Oriented analysis and design, which in my humble opinion is the only way to do things. OO is purely a design paradigm, completely free of any language constraints. How you implement the design is totally up to you; you can even do it in assembly if you want to! :-) kundi |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ /Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Anyone care to answer the question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Anyone care to answer the question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Anyone care to answer the question? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: C++ | 01/01/70 00:00 |



