| ??? 02/02/03 12:47 Read: times |
#38055 - RE: "old" components. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If the 8255 shouldn't be used, I don't see any reason why a CPLD version of it should be - programming logic devices isn't a goal in itself here, I presume.
As I indicated, this device - any many other ancient products - HAS its use in learning how to control I/O devices. Don't get me wrong in that I thus would suggest that if you want to learn how to make computer programs you'll have to sit behind a PDP-11 with a teletype terminal, or if you want to make a control system it's best to get the specs of a SC/MP to start with. But I've always been told that it's a good thing to start with the basics - and that's what the 8255 provides in a sense. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| "old" components, new designs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components, @ school ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components., Jez | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components, new designs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components, new designs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "old" components, new designs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: "old" components, new designs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: \ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: \\ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: \\ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: \\\\ | 01/01/70 00:00 |



