| ??? 02/25/03 10:57 Read: times |
#40019 - RE: small network? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Bobby,
I agree with Peter, CAN would be great for this application. Peter forgot to mention CAN is very very fault tolerant too. Can we see some pictures of the ship please ? Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Spelling adj. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: small network? | 01/01/70 00:00 |