Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/27/00 14:43
Read: times


 
#4018 - RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu
One thing I'll add a minor suggestion to a previous post by Erik...

If you are going to separate EQ first from the GT & LT cases, its a little less efficient because statistically most cases will have to pass through the first comparison (since many more cases are GT and LT). Its more real-time efficient to screen out the more likely cases first.

I understand this is a very minor point in most applications but in the type of real-time work we do, it matters to us. And its not a bad thing to think about when establishing a style of programming.

-Jay C. Box


List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
"Smaller then" "Greater then"            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am            01/01/70 00:00      
Range Comparison on the 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
Range Comparison on the 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Range Comparison on the 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: Range Comparison on the 8051            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am            01/01/70 00:00      
END OF THREAD            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List