| ??? 07/28/00 15:53 Read: times |
#4029 - RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am |
Jay, you are right if you do not need the original contents of the acc; however "my" method does not affect the accumulator, which is my main reason for using it.
Again, as so often "one size fits all" may be true for pantyhose, but not for programming. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| "Smaller then" "Greater then" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
END OF THREAD | 01/01/70 00:00 |



