| ??? 07/30/00 18:49 Read: times |
#4048 - RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am |
Some remarks to all experts.
1) To Sascha Pypke: you had to write SUBB A,#009H instead of SUBB A,09H 2) To Erik Malund: you had to write NOT_EQUAL: JNC A_IS_GREATER instead of NOT_EQUAL: JC A_IS_GREATER 3) To Jay C.Box: your ways are unjustifiedly complicated. It plaited up my bends:-). Your second example doesnt work. Check it with R7=99. Please be more carefully in examples. The young developers look at you:-). Now to the question. I suppose the CJNE is the second importance instruction especially constructed to compare two unsigned values. The easier way to do GT/EQ/LT determination is following (by Erik). CJNE A,#100,NE JMP EQ NE: JC LT GT: JMP A_GT_100 ;Acc>100 EQ: JMP A_EQ_100 ;Acc=100 LT: JMP A_LT_100 ;Acc<100 To do GT vs LE=LT+EQ: CJNE A,#100,NE JMP LE NE: JC LE GT: JMP A_GT_100 ;Acc>100 LE: JMP A_LE_100 ;Acc<=100 To do LT vs GE=GT+EQ: CJNE A,#100,NE JMP GE NE: JC LT GE: JMP A_GE_100 ;Acc>=100 LT: JMP A_LT_100 ;Acc<100 Regards, George, program monster:-) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| "Smaller then" "Greater then" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Range Comparison on the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&qu | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "Smaller then" "Greater then&am | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
END OF THREAD | 01/01/70 00:00 |



