Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/30/03 01:36
Read: times


 
#42534 - RE: AD-conv. _ Steve
Responding to: ???'s previous message
::PS Averaging data doesn't "get rid of data" - it increases precision ::

It does get rid of data - the peaks are smothered in the averaging and if your area of interest IS in the peak, you do loose them.


::Precision increases with sqrt(number in average)::

And what would be this be - number in average ? Sounds interesting.

Raghu


List of 19 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Read data reliably            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Is the code for 8052?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed...            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: AD-conv. _ Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: AD-conv. _ Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: AD-conv. _ Steve            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List