| ??? 03/30/03 12:49 Read: times |
#42545 - RE: AD-conv. _ Steve Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raghunathan R wrote:
------------------------------- ::PS Averaging data doesn't "get rid of data" - it increases precision :: It does get rid of data - the peaks are smothered in the averaging and if your area of interest IS in the peak, you do loose them. Then we are coming to arguments about sampling bandwidths and such like, to which, I defer to Jez. ::Precision increases with sqrt(number in average):: And what would be this be - number in average ? Sounds interesting. number of samples - 10 samples, sqrt(10) increases in precision. Or is it Ln(10) ? Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Read data reliably | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is the code for 8052? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. and averages, tricks needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. _ Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: AD-conv. _ Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: AD-conv. _ Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 |



