Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/10/03 13:08
Read: times


 
#43204 - RE: faulty 89C52BP?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Original Intel does state Voh at 80uA, the NMOS chip. Atmel state Voh = 3.8V @ Ioh=25uA.
So in fact Atmel chip should have an inferior performance, which is not the case.
Further Philips chip still has a higher supply current as compared to Atmel. How many specs have to be compared, if a uC cannot drive a classical darlington array, I wonder how they figure out the chip requirements to design with? More so this with an existing design which in production by my customer, so that makes every uC design a future dangling sword on both our heads. This is precisely why we have microsoft jokes on compatibility issues.


List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: faulty 89C52BP? - Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: faulty 89C52BP? -Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: faulty 89C52BP? -Kalpak            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: faulty 89C52BP?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List