Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/30/03 19:08
Read: times


 		 #47048 - RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Also, FWIW, since I'm using the Keil compiler, I would prefer that this additional ram just look like "xdata" as opposed to some funky paged scheme that requires diddling with SFR bits.

GB


List of 8 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
> 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: > 256 bytes of RAM (part # recommend?)            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List