| ??? 06/25/03 10:28 Read: times |
#49271 - RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The uncertainty of the MSF signal is quite a bit bigger than the error budget.
Charles' link is EXCELLENT - many thanks Charles. Its exactly what I was looking for, and it didn't turn up in my first searches last night. The field of application is not dissimilar. The real trick is that the application requires a periodic time stamp in a data record, good to 50nSec, in a piece of equipment in a field anywhere on the planet. Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Happy birthday, Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock. | 01/01/70 00:00 |



