Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/25/03 11:25
Read: times


 
#49278 - RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Now I'm confused!

The Brooks Shera article, excellent as it is, is only concerned with frequency, not 'absolute time'. If it is just high accuracy/high stability frequency you're after, there are cheaper and easier ways of obtaining that. However, if you do need 'absolute time', the article is of little use.

Could you expand a little on your application, if only to satisfy my curiosity?


Rob.

PS I sent you that article a few months ago!

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
+/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Happy birthday, Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List