Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/25/03 13:09
Read: times


 
#49285 - RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"... this is not easy at all."

't would hardly be fun if it was ;o)

Your proposed solution sounds reasonable to me; I guess I would use the same approach. You should be able to get it running properly. How far apart in time are the events to be stamped?

"I don't remember you posting that link to me though !"

I actually mailed you the article in pdf format as a result of this exchange we had.

Rob.

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
+/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Happy birthday, Steve            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: +/- 50nSec precise clock.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List