| ??? 09/22/00 22:01 Read: times |
#5267 - RE: Dividing a clock by two |
I agree, the 7400 solution would be more practical in my case. Appreciate the information!!!
Thanks J PS Yup, took the position, but I don't start for another week...tying up loose ends with my other position |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Dividing a clock by two | 01/01/70 00:00 |