??? 09/22/03 14:56 Read: times |
#55114 - RE: dead flash Responding to: ???'s previous message |
That would be 'no', then? :)
Hallo Donald, there are so many different flash families on the market and such heavy change and developement, that mechanism I told about can already be antiquated, today. I wanted to focuse, that stress due to very high electric field is so extreme, that a predictable behaviour normaly cannot be expected at end of lifetime. It's important to note, that memory cell gets totally destroyed at end of lifetime, in a sense, that doping concentration and resistivity is highly affected. But how knows, may be memory cells are becoming fabricated in future, such that kind of destruction becomes predictable? I think only a close contact to manufacturer can finally answer this question. Regards, Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash - Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash - Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash - Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash - Oleg | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash - Oleg![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: dead flash | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OK | 01/01/70 00:00 |