| ??? 09/26/03 11:10 Read: times |
#55552 - RE: troubles moving from AT89C52 to AT89S52 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Maybe some variable changes value of some new special register in AT89S52?
It cannot be truth as long as you use memory with correct way: [0x00...0x7F] - for both direct and indirect access; [0x80...0xFF] - for either indirect (@R0/@R1) access or stack area only. Indeed, if you somehow utilize memory [0x80...0xFF] with direct access then you should know that it is not a user memory but SFRs instead. But why do you write into SFRs which are not defined for C52 then? Good days! |



