| ??? 12/08/03 18:37 Read: times |
#60179 - P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB |
I have developed using an P89C51RD2.
Now I am trying to use the P87C51SBBB (OTP version). I had used the P89 for 11,0592. Not X2 ! Is there any difference to use the P87 ? I can't do it. I don't now why ! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 |