| ??? 12/09/03 17:02 Read: times |
#60239 - RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB addendum Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Do you, by chance use the ERAM that the P89C51Rx2 has and the P87C51 does not?
Or the IRAM (0x80-0xff). If your app is short on stack, the P89C51Rx2 will run since the stack can go to 0xff, but the 87c51 will overrun at 0x7f. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: a simple test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: P89C51RD2 and P87C51SBBB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Thanks Everybody = P89 X P87 | 01/01/70 00:00 |