| ??? 02/23/04 16:01 Read: times |
#65369 - RE: The trouble with mars rover Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Guys,
I don't understand why when a new picture was stored, why couldn't the operating system just delete the oldest file or at least just give a memory full warning? This should not have been a major error and should have been handled easily by the operating system. I agree with Jez, when I buy software from another company, I have to validate the software (at least if it used in FDA work). NASA should have validated the OS fro Windriver. Jacob |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: The trouble with mars rover | 01/01/70 00:00 |



