??? 04/30/04 07:12 Read: times |
#69536 - RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hai Thomas,
I am sorry that to say I didnt get your problem clearly. But still why I am responding is that, I had already done the work that you are doing sucessfully. If you are clear, I shall explain. Regards, Hanumanthu Indrakanti |
Topic | Author | Date |
Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
First time NO; Second time YES | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Data acquisition with 89c51rd2xx![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |