Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/07/04 11:49
Read: times


 
#71957 - RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232
Responding to: ???'s previous message
" but want to know why 232 can not be designed in this way?"

But why should it be ? Every communication protocol has been devised with a particular target application in view and what is point is trying to fit a square plug in a round hole ?

I know the net overflows with information on RS232 but the following link is one of my favorites :

http://www.beyondlogic.org/serial/serial.htm

While there don't forget to check out the stuff on USB, parallel port etc. You will be glad you did so.

And this link gives all details of all buses :

http://www.interfacebus.com/Bus_Design_Top.html


And this link gives a lovely chart which will answer your question directly :

http://www.interfacebus.com/Design_In...table.html

Come back if you any more doubdts on busses.

Raghu


List of 9 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232- Bartosz            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List