| ??? 06/07/04 19:26 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#71992 - RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
erik link is not visibale in your post will u please re post it
I do not know if micro (u) will re post it. It is not something I should post, "<--- links" mean "look in links to the left and you will find it". Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232- Bartosz | 01/01/70 00:00 |