Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/08/04 17:49
Read: times


 
#72097 - RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232- Bartosz
Responding to: ???'s previous message
"RS232 is meant for simple easy communication in friendly conditions. "

That, is a revelation of sorts. Maybe by friendly you mean short distances, noise free environment etc...

"to attach a modem that lies on a shelf to a PC under your desk."

What will happen if the modem lies OVER the desk ;-)

Whenever you are posting a "detailed" reply it would be better if you take care to check on, atleast the basics. Most of what you wrote "generally" convey that RS485 is for serious applications and RS232 is for friendly folks who would'nt mind loosing a "bit" here and there.

Sorry if I sound harsh - just a friendly nudge. Nothing more to it ;-)

Raghu



List of 9 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: why rs-485 & not rs-232- Bartosz            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List