??? 06/10/04 17:08 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#72319 - RE: migration to 16 bit micro Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If I want to migrate to 16 bit microcontroler from the 8051, which one would you advise.
If you want to be '51 compatible, there is, in my opinion, only one choice: the Philips XA. However, were I to migrate a '51 project to 'more bits' I would go with the ARM. ARM controllers from e.g. Philips are almost cheaper then '51s. Another advantage here is that again you will have an architecture with a myriad of derivatives. Not to mention that if you get shorted by a supplier, there is always another brand. When making projects with e.g. Cygnal - which lock me to one supplier - I always make sure I can do the same (with a different board layout) with other chips. As an example, my current project exist in one fullly debugged version with a Cygnal f126 and in a 'paper version' with a Dallas and CPLD. When a miracle hjappens, and I have time, I might redo this one for an ARM as backup instead of the Dallas. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Definitely ARM! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Definitely ARM! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: J. Smith | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: migration to 16 bit micro | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: unique device company | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Go ahead, go ARM 32 bit ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Go ahead, go ARM 32 bit !![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |