??? 06/16/04 08:44 Read: times |
#72568 - RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi, Donald,
I did it. The Flesh Programming is similar to T89C51RD2, but HSB don't. That is the point. Thank You, Igor. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Parallel programming AT89C51RD2/ED2?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |