??? 06/23/04 05:05 Read: times |
#72988 - RE: serious LPC932 problems Responding to: ???'s previous message |
After your experiences.....do you like the LPC932? Hmmm, you asked the same thing of Robert. I can't help but feel I'm being set up for something here. :) I liked the features that the LPC932 provides. And there was still some doubt in my mind that maybe the problems with the part were somehow being influenced by something that wasn't correctly designed on the hardware side (I only handled the firmware development). But now that I've seen Robert's comments regarding the LPC932 and know that we're not the only ones that have had this kind of problem I'd be hard pressed to recommend the LPC932 for a new design without some assurance that the problems have been fixed. Regards, Craig Steiner |
Topic | Author | Date |
serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: 89S8252 errate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: 89S8252 errate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LPC932A1 to address known issues![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |