??? 06/23/04 10:32 Read: times |
#72998 - Re: 89S8252 errate Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I used extensively revision S and earlier and detected none of the described errata.
Maybe it happens not, since I use an external supervisor circuit (MAX813L). Also I tried to force the "never ISP state" without success. Putting all SPI pin to low or permanent toggling immediately after reset has no influence on the ISP capability. Maybe the difference is, that I activate the ISP interface only after about 50ms after the reset pin was activated. Thus no fighting of different output levels can occur. Peter |
Topic | Author | Date |
serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: serious LPC932 problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: 89S8252 errate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: 89S8252 errate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: birth pangs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LPC932A1 to address known issues![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |