Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/24/04 13:06
Read: times


 
Msg Score: 0
 +1 Good Answer/Helpful
 -1 Overrated
#73102 - RE: Why learn assembler part two
Responding to: ???'s previous message
While I agree that learning assembler programming is an essencial part using embedded processors 1 I do think that insisting on only using assembler is akin to insisting on only building op-amps and logic gates from descreet components,it can be done but it isnt because its not very good design practice.
C is used because its 2 portable,easy to debug,modify,document,can be easily split over many developers,has many standard libraries etc,etc.

re 1) Very few still insist that pure assembler is the way to go, I think that today there are more pure C than pure assembler advocates. My personal opininon is "the right mix of the two".
re 2) I really think that the portability of C in the small embedded world is a myth. While calculations and such indeed will be portable, the predominance of I/O in these designs make a porting a huge task regardless of the language

Erik

List of 6 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List