??? 06/24/04 13:06 Read: times Msg Score: 0 +1 Good Answer/Helpful -1 Overrated |
#73102 - RE: Why learn assembler part two Responding to: ???'s previous message |
While I agree that learning assembler programming is an essencial part using embedded processors 1 I do think that insisting on only using assembler is akin to insisting on only building op-amps and logic gates from descreet components,it can be done but it isnt because its not very good design practice.
C is used because its 2 portable,easy to debug,modify,document,can be easily split over many developers,has many standard libraries etc,etc. re 1) Very few still insist that pure assembler is the way to go, I think that today there are more pure C than pure assembler advocates. My personal opininon is "the right mix of the two". re 2) I really think that the portability of C in the small embedded world is a myth. While calculations and such indeed will be portable, the predominance of I/O in these designs make a porting a huge task regardless of the language Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why we have HLLs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why we have HLLs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why we have HLLs![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |