??? 06/24/04 15:04 Read: times |
#73114 - Why we have HLLs Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jez Smith said:
C is used because its portable,easy to debug,modify,document,can be easily split over many developers,has many standard libraries etc,etc. While these are all true and very nice, you've missed the fundamental one; the entire raison d'etre of all high-level language is to optimise Programmer productivity. In the early days, this was very much at the expense of run-time efficiency (speed, size, etc) - and this is the root of many of the "you've got to use Assembler if you need fast, compact code" arguments. The fact is, with modern high-performance, low-cost hardware, the need for ultimate runtime efficiency is greatly diminished, and modern optimising compilers do a very good job; the cost & availability of Good programmers, on the other hand, is an entirely different matter... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why learn assembler part two | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why we have HLLs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why we have HLLs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why we have HLLs![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |