Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/25/04 21:55
Read: times


 
#73178 - RE: Why we have HLLs
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Andy Neil wrote:
-------------------------------
The fact is, with modern high-performance, low-cost hardware, the need for ultimate runtime efficiency is greatly diminished, and modern optimising compilers do a very good job; the cost & availability of Good programmers, on the other hand, is an entirely different matter...


I agree that ultimate runtime efficiency is not always needed. If one develops a domestic electronic heating control, there is no need to spend time for super efficient and time-critical programming. On the other hand, the fact that you can make your (less than efficient) application run by just adding more "horsepower" to it, should never be an excuse for suboptimal programming (and that is where I agree on the windows bloatware statement of Erik).

regards
Patrick





List of 6 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Why learn assembler part two            01/01/70 00:00      
   Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Why we have HLLs            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List