??? 07/07/04 21:39 Read: times |
#73754 - Hi speed serial commn revisited |
Hello ....
I was just going through some of the previous posts on serial communications and I would like to have a few clarifications : Note: Use crystal=11.0592 MHz You should be able to nicely support the 115200 baud rate to PC. Good Luck Mike Karas an 18.432 Mhz will give the same baud rate, and be faster. J Guy With a 11.0592 crystal and using serial interrupt , and a ring buffer for temporary storage ,is it likely that if the code size is big enough the serial interrupts come rapidly enough to overwrite the buffer ? If there is sufficient RAM avlbl on chip ( 89C51RD2xx ) , how does one optimise ( calculate ) the size of the ring buffer to avoid this ? When J Guy says that 18.432 MHz will give the same baud rate and be faster , what does it mean ? 115200 baud should be the same whether 18.432 or 11.0592 . Or is it just that he means the code will be processed faster so that buffer overwrite does not happen . If a board is working well with a 12 MHz chip , will there be any problems if I pluck it out and replace with a 20 MHz , asuuming there are no timing implications on the software side ? By the way, many thanks to all who contributed on my earlier post on the batteries. It really opened up new vistas , especially since I am not an electronics engineer and scrambling to pick up the concepts. Thomas |
Topic | Author | Date |
Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Hi speed serial commn revisited![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |