Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/13/04 21:55
Read: times


 
Msg Score: -1
 -1 Message Not Useful
 -1 Offensive/Flame
 +1 Underrated
#74201 - This is the fundamental flaw
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Prahlad J. Purohit said:
A triac once triggered its fully ON and there is nothing like turning ON slowly.

Prahlad has thus identified the fundamental, fatal flaw in this scheme. :-(

A Triac (like an SCR or Thyristor) is a Triggered device - it is either triggered or it isn't; it is either conducting or it isn't.

A Triac does not have a linear region - as would be required for this scheme. :-(

Sorry, but that's just the nature of the beast.

Even if it were possible, this slow ramp-up would greatly increase the power dissipation - and dealing with that would certainly negate any savings in avoiding zero-cross detection (if, indeed, there are any at all).

Anyway, it's good to have ideas and throw them open to discussion like this - hopefully you've at least learned something about triacs!
After all, how many failures did Edison have before he actually got his lightbulb working...? ;-)

List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      This is the fundamental flaw            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List