Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/14/04 14:39
Read: times


 
#74226 - RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing
Responding to: ???'s previous message
From your previous post, I gather all you want to do is SWITCH the load on or off. Can we define what the load is? A TV, Stereo, lights (how many watts) and how fast do you want to switch them. If all you want to do is turn something on or off infrequently what not use a relay - which is just a switch - just like turning on at the power point. I assume the power outlet is CE (in europe) so there mustn't be an issue with switching EMI for the usual household items. So, say you wanted to make a box that turned on your house lights randomly whilst you're away - have your micro control some relays. The hardest part is choosing which one! Many years of my professional life was designing light dimmers controlling kilowatts of lights. If I only wanted to switch a load, I would use a relay. Why? You have to be pretty nasty to a relay to make it fail, whereas a short circuit will kill most triacs well before the fuse decides to blow or the breaker trip.

A similar method to your ramping idea is used in some light dimmers but IGBT's are used. They are either turned on slowly or turned off slowly (by slowly I mean 10..800 microseconds) so you don't need a big inductor. Dissipation is a problem though for large loads and you need to have a bit of protection around the devices to protect against short circuits and high voltage spikes.

That's my ten cents worth!

List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      This is the fundamental flaw            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
   RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
      RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
         RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
            RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
               RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      
                  RE: Ramping instead of zero-crossing            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List