??? 08/06/04 00:38 Read: times |
#75519 - Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"ASEM Will accept the syntax except for the 10HP-part, it does not accept digits at the beginning. "
How I wish the problem ended there !! I sure am aware of this and the code sample that I posted was just to demonstrate the issue. I named the variables with most common ones. Sorry if I had confused you all. The actual listing file ( assembles fine but does not work as expected ) is given below : 65: ;************************************************ 66: ;===== INTERNAL RAM STORAGE ===================== 67: ;************************************************ 68: 69: N 10 DSEG AT 10H 70: 71: 10 N 01 DLY100: DS 1 ; 100mSec Timer preload location 72: 11 N 01 DLY005: DS 1 ; 5mSec Timer preload location 73: 12 N 01 CNT_INTR: DS 1 ; 5ms multiplier 74: 13 N 01 CTR_DI: DS 1 ; Debounce period counter 75: 14 N 01 LUPCNTR: DS 1 ; General purpose loop counter 76: 15 N 01 CNT10SEC: DS 1 ; 10 sec ticker 77: 78: N 20 DSEG AT 20H 79: 80: 20 N 01 DOT1_IMAG: DS 1 ; Output group 1 image 81: 21 N 01 DOT2_IMAG: DS 1 ; Output group 2 image 82: 22 N 01 DIN_01: DS 1 ; Input group images ( 4 bytes ) 83: 23 N 01 DIN_02: DS 1 84: 24 N 01 DIN_03: DS 1 .... .... .... 121: ;*********************************************** 122: ;======= BIT ADDRESABLE RAM ==================== 123: ;*********************************************** 124: 125: N 20 BSEG AT 20H 126: 127: ; Group_1 controls 128: 129: 20 N 01 KEC_DRV: DBIT 1 ; Enable of Variable speed drive 130: 21 N 01 PRE1_SOL: DBIT 1 ; 20 Bar solenoid 131: 22 N 01 PRE2_SOL: DBIT 1 ; 38 Bar solenoid 132: 23 N 01 PRE3_SOL: DBIT 1 ; 180 Bar solenoid 133: 24 N 01 FLO1_SOL: DBIT 1 ; Flow #1 select 134: 25 N 01 FLO2_SOL: DBIT 1 ; FLow #2 select 135: 26 N 01 PULS_SOL: DBIT 1 ; Pulser sol 136: 27 N 01 PROP_ENA: DBIT 1 ; Proportional valve enable 137: 138: ; Group_2 controls 139: 140: 28 N 01 PRO_RAMP: DBIT 1 ; Enable prop. ramp .... .... .... Dose anything appear amiss in the above ? To me they look fine. Bit segments 20H to 27H must overlay the Byte segment at 20H ? Hmmm looks like more head scratching to do. Raghu |
Topic | Author | Date |
Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem defenition - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Automatic up I/O update - Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem solved - Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thread can close happily![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |