??? 08/06/04 05:45 Read: times |
#75533 - RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Raghu,
As Rob mentioned you can follow his method except, use EQU instead of DS, (of course you must predefine (or alocate) your registers first). Rob wrote >>IOBYTE_1: DS 1 >>10HPMOTOR BIT IOBYTE_1.0 >>SOL_LOAD BIT IOBYTE_1.1 >>.... >>.... >>SOL_REV BIT IOBYTE_1.7 does not work with ASEM_51, but the following works IOBYTE_1 EQU 20H ; assumed 20H as your base address SOL_LOAD BIT IOBYTE_1.1 .... .... SOL_REV BIT IOBYTE_1.7 I tried this with ASEM5113 ( ie., ASEM_51 ver 1.3). |
Topic | Author | Date |
Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem defenition - Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Automatic up I/O update - Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem solved - Russell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Syntax - Anders, Rob, Charles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Memory mapped I/O hassle | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thread can close happily![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |