| ??? 11/10/04 13:52 Read: times |
#80922 - Why 8051? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Martin Vasilevski said:
I need some help with 8051 VHDL cores. I am a uni student, and am working on a project that requires a simple microcontroller. The purpose is to use a VHDL core and synthesize it for a Xilinx Virtex 2 FPGA. Why have you specifically chosen the 8051? For the purpose of your exercise, wouldn't you be better off with the Xilinx "microblaze" or "picoblaze" thingies - as they're specifically designed by Xilinx for Xilinx devices? http://www.xilinx.com/products/...t_proc.htm Martin Vasilevski said:
I need something that has been proven in hardware. I imagine Xilinx will have done that... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Overkill?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Over-stretched? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Why 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 VDHL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Take a look at this article | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| picoblaze | 01/01/70 00:00 |