??? 11/11/04 00:11 Read: times |
#80992 - RE: Why 8051? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Ok to answer all the questions.
My VHDL skills. I have done plenty of work in VHDL, but you know what student projects are like. You rarely get to synthesis/implementation level (most of the time u stop at simulation). I do know VHDL in terms of coding and all, and am quite comfortable with that. But that Oregano one, is too advanced for me. It has configuration files, macros. I have neevr worked with that, and this being a single person project I have to do it. I got the VHDL for programmable logic book, but I need a better one for such advanced concepts. Why 8051. Originally I was going to work with an AVR microprocessor. I got that one working, but then realised it has very little memory (just 1K). Not enough for what Im doing. I need a free VHDL resource, and the 8051 seemed a better choice, because of all the free cores, it has what I need. more memory space, proven compilers, various simulatin tools. But. Now I found out about the Picoblaze and Microblaze ( I always thought Microblaze was a development board :|) I'll check those out. Thanks for the help. |
Topic | Author | Date |
8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Overkill?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Over-stretched? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Why 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8051 VDHL![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Take a look at this article | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: 8051 VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
picoblaze | 01/01/70 00:00 |