| ??? 11/19/04 09:39 Read: times |
#81494 - Same subject as the post I'm replying to Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"tthhatt's all fffolks"
Not quite: union Richard { long target; chat putit[4]; //<-- }; //<-- And note that putit[3] will access the LSB of target, which I don't think was the byte the OP was after. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Efficient method... (C question) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about a union | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well that makes sense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's the standard way! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same subject as the post I'm replying to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| byte order | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks! :) | 01/01/70 00:00 |