| ??? 11/19/04 10:16 Read: times |
#81496 - byte order Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Donald Catto said:
note that putit[3] will access the LSB of target That, of course, is the non-portable, implementation-specific part! See: http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=81471 |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Efficient method... (C question) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what about a union | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well that makes sense! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's the standard way! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Same subject as the post I'm replying to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| byte order | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks! :) | 01/01/70 00:00 |