??? 12/22/04 01:01 Read: times |
#83600 - one more Responding to: ???'s previous message |
- Timer0 not initilaized properly.
- Timer0 was not started at all. - Timer0 was started but stopped by some other routine and never re-started. - You believe to have set the priority as you said. But the truth is different due to a typo. - Broken MCU Another: - Timer0 Interrupt is not enabled (or maybe you included that in "Timer0 not initilaized properly?") |