| ??? 01/24/05 16:23 Read: times |
#85667 - oops Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Neither is TL0.
of course. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Timer 0 Mode 0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no and why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CD quality sampling freq.? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 vs 13 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not T2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uC crystal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uC Crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cost saving because of may | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cost Saving | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at those volumes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| baudrates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baud Rates | 01/01/70 00:00 |