Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/24/05 17:18
Read: times


 
#85676 - 16 vs 13
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I don't know why it was designed as 13 bits - better ask Intel
That is 4048 compatibility
16 bit mode does not have auto reload so, if I used this mode, by the time I have reloaded the timer in an ISR the actual interval is uncertain.
much less so
neither the 13 bit mode nor the 16 bit mode does have auto reload. In 13 bit mode you have 32 instruction times to get TH loaded, in 16 bit you have 256.

Anyhow, how about T2?

Erik

List of 17 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Timer 0 Mode 0            01/01/70 00:00      
   no and why            01/01/70 00:00      
      CD quality sampling freq.?            01/01/70 00:00      
         oops            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why            01/01/70 00:00      
         alternatives            01/01/70 00:00      
            Alternatives            01/01/70 00:00      
               comment            01/01/70 00:00      
         16 vs 13            01/01/70 00:00      
            Why not T2            01/01/70 00:00      
               uC crystal ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  uC Crystal            01/01/70 00:00      
                     cost saving because of may            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Cost Saving            01/01/70 00:00      
                           at those volumes            01/01/70 00:00      
                              baudrates            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Baud Rates            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List