??? 01/24/05 17:18 Read: times |
#85676 - 16 vs 13 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I don't know why it was designed as 13 bits - better ask Intel
That is 4048 compatibility 16 bit mode does not have auto reload so, if I used this mode, by the time I have reloaded the timer in an ISR the actual interval is uncertain. much less so neither the 13 bit mode nor the 16 bit mode does have auto reload. In 13 bit mode you have 32 instruction times to get TH loaded, in 16 bit you have 256. Anyhow, how about T2? Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Timer 0 Mode 0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no and why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CD quality sampling freq.? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16 vs 13 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not T2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uC crystal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uC Crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cost saving because of may | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost Saving | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at those volumes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
baudrates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baud Rates![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |