??? 01/24/05 20:40 Read: times |
#85700 - cost saving because of may Responding to: ???'s previous message |
baudrate with 11.0502 and T1 is max 57k6 not 19k2
I don't want to use timer2 which has a 16 bit autoreload because a) this code may be used on a very low end 8051 For a piece of code this simple, it does not make sense to code based on a "may" I do not know what you are making, but it does not make sense these days to use "insufficient" processors. ... An interesting topic of debate in its own right. I have spent the greater part of my career developing very low cost high volume products where it *only* makes economic sense to go with the the very cheapest (and usually barely sufficient) micro. the price differential between a "basic" and "advanced" derivative is (at volume) so small that it take an awful lot of product to go beyond engr hour $/volume < HW cost savings/unit In additrion, it is known that, "fancy costsaving engineering" is more error prone than "straight engineering"> I am not advocating "go ahead and use a Rolls Royce when a VW will do, but, in my opinion. 95% of the efforts in saving HW cost are misplaced. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Timer 0 Mode 0 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no and why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CD quality sampling freq.? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
oops | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
16 vs 13 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not T2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uC crystal ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
uC Crystal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
cost saving because of may | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost Saving | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
at those volumes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
baudrates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baud Rates![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |