| ??? 01/26/01 18:08 Read: times |
#8667 - RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? |
<html>
<head> <title>MacCayev and daughters</title> </head> <body> <table border="0"> <blockquote> <p align="center"> <em><strong><marquee bgcolor="#FFFFFF" height="26" scrolldelay="34" width="200">Steve, I have a question</marquee></strong></em></p> </blockquote> </table> </body> </html> As a matter of fact, it takes around 11.5 msec but is it possibble to use 9600 baud rate @ 12 MHz of classic '51? George |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baud Rate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: for Craig and Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: for Craig and Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 |