| ??? 01/26/01 18:33 Read: times |
#8668 - RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? |
Hi George.
Yes, I think it can, though I have always used the classic crystal with the classic 51.(11.0592Mhz) We still don't know what the original questioner is asking though.... Steve |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baud Rate? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: for Craig and Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: for Craig and Steve | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Transfer time vs. Crystal Freq ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 |