| ??? 02/18/05 14:24 Read: times |
#87880 - :) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
haha..thanks for your reply. So do you figure out anyway to solve my doubt? Now I am stucked at the 4 bytes part.
May be you are right,but I am doing a project which I need to keep increasing the bytes to evaluate the efficiency.It certainly took a long time to process it hence my target is up to 64 bytes (512 bits). Please give me some hints if you have figure out any. Thanks! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Push and Pop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible - yes. practical - no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not scientific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small correction to the previous post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:) | 01/01/70 00:00 |