| ??? 02/24/05 11:01 Read: times |
#88303 - a small correction to the previous post Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
128 44.46 (hum, a deviation - I don't know why...) I found out why. My timing routine did not account for the (roughly) 55ms PC timer wraparound correctly. Adding 55ms to 44ms we get what expected - 4 times the previous value (25ms). Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Push and Pop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible - yes. practical - no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not scientific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small correction to the previous post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:) | 01/01/70 00:00 |