| ??? 02/18/05 14:46 Read: times |
#87881 - not scientific Responding to: ???'s previous message |
May be you are right,but I am doing a project which I need to keep increasing the bytes to evaluate the efficiency.It certainly took a long time to process it hence my target is up to 64 bytes (512 bits).
Please give me some hints if you have figure out any. Thanks! I guess that the time for 4 bytes will be something like the square of the time for 3 bytes and the time for 5 bytes will be something like the square of the time for 4 bytes ...... You will need to start the calculation at 3 or 4 bytes since some of the overhead does not enter at 1 or 2 bytes. so you time for 64 by 64 bytes will be something like 50 to the power of 62 whatever that comes out to. Erik If the above is wrong, most likely you need to replace "square" with "cube" |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Push and Pop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Loop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong value | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| possible - yes. practical - no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not scientific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| test | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a small correction to the previous post | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
:) | 01/01/70 00:00 |