| ??? 02/19/05 03:18 Read: times |
#87935 - Bit Stuffing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I may have missed something in the discussion but:
Why not store each line (of 25 bits) in 4 Bytes in the EEPROM leaving another 7bits remaining for the "line number/s" or some other useful feature unique to the particular record. This would save heaps of memory and give you quite a lot of flexibility in the way that the patterns were repeated as well as speeding up readtimes, (only 4 bytes instead of 25) Marshall |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Database managment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| U have to make Linked List File System | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Overcomplicated? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Database managment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Clear as mud! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Database managment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jacquard ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| row size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jacquard loom? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Towels | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Towels | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's easier done on the PC side | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Me too said the dog | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Right, then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not just you but many | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Database managment | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then correct it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| eeprom size | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| let the PC do it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap file system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PC do it - Write Time for 128 K EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd still let the PC do it! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is Pravin's choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Bit Stuffing | 01/01/70 00:00 |