??? 02/23/05 08:46 Read: times |
#88203 - Wrong approach Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kurnia Brahmana said:
Your code 'shift first' more suitable since it is more ASM like to me. Your problem is that you are thinking in assembler, and trying to write assembler in 'C'. To gain the advantage of 'C', you need to learn the language and think in 'C' - otherwise you gain no advantage, since you will probably be more productive in "native" assembler! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Rotating Carry (CY) through ACC in C51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is a keyboard interface sub routine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A51 to C51 interfacing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
inline | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it does, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nevertheless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Case in point | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
shift first | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong approach | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using chainsaw to perform dental surgery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ANSI C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
microcontroller C portability is a myth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Portability No .. Commonality Maybe![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |